这样的问题在澳微帮一般找不到好的答案，推荐quora 我是学建筑的，so提供建筑作为参考 "RMIT is more technological based with the use of parametric design and softwares while University of Melbourne is more conservative and practical in terms of preparing newly grads with skills for the outside world. There are academics at both schools teaching the formal/traditional architecture who prefer sketches apart to, say Big or UN studio sort of "diagram" . So, to say University of Melbourne is more conservative than RMIT does not quite reflect the ethos of the school. They are very contemporary in essence.Reputation , RMIT is more prestigious in architecture than the other , globally and nationally no doubt, they would rank top 10 easily in the world . Like Cambridge and the AA, everyone knows Cambridge whereas only people who have Arch background will know what the hell is the AA. Having said that, the quality of your portfolio is the primary driver for graduate employment." ——Munagala Bhargav
2 个回复
維塔不掉
赞同来自:
我是学建筑的，so提供建筑作为参考
"RMIT is more technological based with the use of parametric design and softwares while University of Melbourne is more conservative and practical in terms of preparing newly grads with skills for the outside world.
There are academics at both schools teaching the formal/traditional architecture who prefer sketches apart to, say Big or UN studio sort of "diagram" .
So, to say University of Melbourne is more conservative than RMIT does not quite reflect the ethos of the school. They are very contemporary in essence.Reputation , RMIT is more prestigious in architecture than the other , globally and nationally no doubt, they would rank top 10 easily in the world . Like Cambridge and the AA, everyone knows Cambridge whereas only people who have Arch background will know what the hell is the AA.
Having said that, the quality of your portfolio is the primary driver for graduate employment."
——Munagala Bhargav
王頔
赞同来自: